Legal Opinion

Hartpence v. Grouleff

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 2, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

28 N.J. Super. 125 (1953)

100 A.2d 298

KENNETH C. HARTPENCE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

HANS GROULEFF, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 26, 1953.

Decided November 2, 1953.

Mr. Franklin W. Kielb argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

Mr. Anthony M. Hauck, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Hauck and Herrigel, attorneys).

Before Judges CLAPP, GOLDMANN and EWART.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CLAPP, S.J.A.D.

This is an auto accident case in which the jury found no cause for action. Pursuant to leave given by us, appeal…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Carlo v. the Okonite-Callender Cable Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. Allegro v. Afton Village Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Smith v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Capone v. NortonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartpence v. GrouleffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. State v. MorettiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Brendel v. Public Service Elec. and Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. Clarkson v. KellyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Gallichio v. GuminaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API