United States v. Dyer
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Chief Judge.
At issue is the meaning and application of a 2003 Sentencing Guideline for possessing child pornography, § 2G2.4(e)(2), which instructed sentencing judges to apply the stiffer penalties for trafficking in child pornography cases “[i]f the offense involved trafficking in material involving the sexual exploitation of a minor ... including ... possessing material involving the sexual exploitation of a minor with intent to traffic.” U.S.S.G. § 2G2.4(c)(2). The issue is one of first impression for this circuit. The defendant, Mark David Dyer, primarily argues that the sentencing…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Maryland v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. PiresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Santiago-MendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- United States v. PelletierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Diaz AriasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.