Legal Opinion

United States v. Dyer

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 28, 2009No. 08-1343PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Chief Judge.

At issue is the meaning and application of a 2003 Sentencing Guideline for possessing child pornography, § 2G2.4(e)(2), which instructed sentencing judges to apply the stiffer penalties for trafficking in child pornography cases “[i]f the offense involved trafficking in material involving the sexual exploitation of a minor ... including ... possessing material involving the sexual exploitation of a minor with intent to traffic.” U.S.S.G. § 2G2.4(c)(2). The issue is one of first impression for this circuit. The defendant, Mark David Dyer, primarily argues that the sentencing…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Maryland v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. PiresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Santiago-MendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. PelletierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Diaz AriasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API