Ficek v. Ficek
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUTZ, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff brought this action and defendant counterclaimed, both seeking a divorce. The plaintiff failed to reply, but the parties stipulated in writing that plaintiff withdraw her complaint and consent that the action be tried on defendant’s counterclaim. On the evidence produced at the trial, the court found that defendant had established his counterclaim for divorce on the ground of adultery of plaintiff. We have examined the evidence and find that it sustains the trial court’s decision. The only issue contested in the hearing before the trial court concerned the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kucera v. KuceraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Strobel v. StrobelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Gress v. GressNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Rufer v. RuferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Noakes v. NoakesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ferguson v. FergusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- DeForest v. DeForestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Silseth v. LevangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Jordana v. CorleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Matson v. MatsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.