Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of Louisville v. Lustig
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided December 7, 1989No. Civ. A. 87-5488, 88-1682 and 89-202PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LIVAUDAIS, District Judge.
Pelican Homestead & Savings Association, successor by merger of First Financial of Louisiana Savings and Loan Association (hereafter “First Financial”), has previously filed a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) to dismiss the RICO count in the complaint, Count XXXI. The motion raises a legal question not yet addressed by this circuit, viz., whether a corporate defendant may be held liable in a RICO civil suit under the doctrine of respondeat superior. We hold that it may not be and grant the motion, although our ruling does not rest on that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of Boston, Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Armco Industrial Credit Corporation v. Slt Warehouse Company, and Richard B. ConklinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 131 Main Street Associates v. MankoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Denison v. KellyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Collective Federal Sav. v. CreelDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1990