Legal Opinion
Collective Federal Sav. v. Creel
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided September 18, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-220-BPublished
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
POLOZOLA, District Judge.
Collective Federal Savings Bank (Collective) 1 is seeking damages under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and 1962(d), alleging that various defendants engaged in a fraudulent scheme to cause Collective to extend real estate loans to various parties. Named as one of the defendants in this case was Glusman, Moore, Wilkinson, Arbour, Broyles and Glusman (GMW), a law firm that handled the closings of the loans.
Collective alleges that GMW is vicariously liable for the actions of-one to its general partners, T. Barry Wilkinson,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Frank Landry v. Air Line Pilots Association International Afl-Cio, Taca Airlines, S.A. And Charles J. HuttingerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of Boston, Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- D & S Auto Parts, Inc. v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Brenda Bishop, A/K/A Brenda Boone v. The Corbitt Marine Ways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.