Legal Opinion

Claggett v. Hampton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 26, 1923No. 12422PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

In 1918 plaintiff in error, ás plaintiff, sued defendants in error, as defendants, in the district court of Nowata county to cancel .certain instruments of record, and to recover 110 acres of real estate. She alleged that in 1913 she executed a contract with the defendant, Hampton, through thq defendant Skillen for the sale 'by her to Hampton of such real- estate for $4,000; that Skillen paid her only $225 of the purchase price and that said contract had been abandoned; that there appeared of record a deed from plaintiff to said Hampton for said real estate; thaj; she never…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Hodges v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CokerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Davis v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Lea v. American Nat. Bank of Pryor CreekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API