Legal Opinion

Archer v. City of Port Clinton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1966No. 39535PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

The question of law involved is whether, where the evidence is undisputed that a pedestrian (1) has *76present knowledge of a dangerous condition in the curb of a city street, (2) departs from a safe path along a driveway into the area beyond the driveway and near the curb where the danger lies unseen under fallen snow, and (3) takes no precaution to avoid it, such conduct of the pedestrian constitutes contributory negligence as a matter of law. The majority of the court is of the opinion that it does, and that Mrs. Archer’s negligence in this case directly contributed to the injuries of which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lundy v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Neckel v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Grau v. KleinschmidtOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Huber v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Mitchell v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Vistein v. KeeneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API