Legal Opinion

Milwaukee County v. Altstadt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The controlling statute is sec. 46.10. Liability for maintenance of a patient in specified public institutions is imposed by sub. (2) thereof upon the- — ■. . patient . . . and his property and estate, including his homestead, or the husband or wife of such patient and. their property or estates, including their homesteads, and in the case of a minor child the father or mother of the patient, and their property and estates, including their homesteads,

The same subsection also authorizes the state department of public welfare to—

“. . . bring action for the enforcement of such liability, except…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Department of Public Welfare v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hahto v. State Department of Mental HygieneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Derouin v. State Department of Public WelfareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State Department of Public Welfare v. ShirleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Milwaukee County Institutions & Departments v. Guardianship of SykoraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Treglown v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Magens Point Resort Hotel v. BenjaminSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API