Legal Opinion
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.S. v. Fantastic Indoor Swap Meet, Inc.; Arthur Lamensdorf, Jr.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 24, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01574Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER S.A.S., Case No. 2:25-cv-01574-EJY 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. 7 FANTASTIC INDOOR SWAP MEET, INC.; and ARTHUR LAMENSDORF, JR., 8 Defendants. 9 10 The Court has before it Arthur Lamensdorf and Fantastic Indoor Swap Meet’s Motion to 11 Dismiss parts of Plaintiff’s Complaint (the “Motion”).1 ECF No. 13. The Court considered the 12 Motion, Opposition (ECF No. 17), and Reply (ECF No. 22). 13 I. Background Summary 14 Defendants move to dismiss parts of Plaintiff’s Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil 15 Procedure…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Limestone Development v. Village of Lemont, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.