Legal Opinion
Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Keala
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided February 11, 2005No. CIV.00-00044 ACK/KSCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND MODIFYING IN PART REPORT OF THE SPECIAL MASTER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, DEFENDANT DAVID KEALA’S BILL OF COSTS AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT DAVID KEALA’S NOTICE OF BILL OF COSTS
KAY, District Judge.
BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1
On January 14, 2000, Plaintiffs John (“John”) and Jane Doe (“Jane”) filed a complaint against the State of Hawaii Department of .Education (“State D.O.E.”), A-Plus Program, Herman Aizawa (“Aiza-wa”), Ralph Murakami (“Murakami”), Maude Yamakawa (‘Yamakawa”), Sonia Zane (“Zane”), and…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- King v. RivasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Christos v. Halker Consulting, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Sedillo v. Long View Systems Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020