Legal Opinion

Sherling v. Gallatin Improvement Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.

The action is brought for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The complaint is in the usual form. The sixth para*536graph of the complaint alleges a failure of the defendants to pay principal and interest on the due date, and that “ there is now due to the plaintiff upon said bond and mortgage ” the principal sum of $14,750, with interest. Defendants, respondents, Jacob Bakrat and Jacob Bakrat, Inc., by their answer specifically denied “ each and every allegation contained in paragraph of the complaint numbered ‘ Sixth.’ ” A separate answer by defendant, respondent, Simon Bachrach, makes a like…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. MoyseNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Hartley v. . HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Shufelt v. ShufeltNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  4. Morris v. FloydNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Fleischer v. TerkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gelber v. Kugel's Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Casten v. TannenbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Ballard v. KnappNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Schindle v. Sharak (In re Salzman)District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  5. Tremont Savings & Loan Ass'n v. OrtizNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API