Legal Opinion
Longo v. Crachiola
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1911No. Docket No. 170PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Wayne; Murfin, J. Case by Vincenzo Longo, Gaetano Longo, and Frank Carlotta, copartners, doing business as the Longo Fruit Company, against Vincenzo Crachiola for fraud. A judgment for the defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiffs on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
This is an action on the case, commenced in justice’s court. The declaration was as follows:
“For that, whereas, heretofore, to wit, the said defendant made various purchases of grapes, oranges, and bananas from the plaintiffs, who are wholesale fruit dealers, in the city of Detroit, amounting to the sum of, to wit, $322, and said plaintiffs allege that the said defendant fraudulently incurred an indebtedness therefor in the said sum. Plaintiffs further allege that they sold said goods to the said defendant with the understanding that he, said defendant, would pay for the same within a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ross v. MinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Fruit Dispatch Co. v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scofield v. ClarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914