Legal Opinion

Lanham v. Marley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1985No. 4-784A206PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants James and Margaret Lanham (the Lanbhams) sued to quiet title, for injunctive relief, and for damages with respect to real property in a boundary dispute. After a bench trial the judge quieted title in the Defendants-Appellees and ordered the Lanhams to take nothing by way of their complaint. The Lanhams appeal this judgment.

Affirmed.

ISSUES

We have restated the questions presented for review as the following three issues:

1. Whether the trial court erred by failing to enter special findings of fact when a timely request was made.

2. Whether a legal survey…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martin v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Clark v. MiddlesworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Vaughan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. National Fleet Supply, Inc. v. FairchildIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Petition of MeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. SponhauerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Owen v. VaughnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Davis v. SponhauerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Kathryn Arnold v. Dennis Arnold (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API