Tennessee Coal, Iron Railroad Co. v. Ray
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The only question on this appeal is whether the amount of damages assessed by the jury was so excessive as to demand a •reduction or a new trial.
Appellant was sued by appellee for damages to his surface rights in a five acre tract of land, where he lived, caused by 'caving of the roof of mining operations, which had been conducted by defendant under it. Liability is not denied, but was admitted on the trial, and there was no exception taken which is insisted on, except the denial of a motion for a new trial on account of the excessive amount of damages by the jury. That amount…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Birmingham Water Works Co. v. MartiniAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
- Jefferson Fertilizer Co. v. RichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Alabama Power Co. v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- City of Birmingham v. PrickettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Birmingham Slag Division of Vulcan Materials Co. v. ChandlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- H. W. Peerson Drilling Company v. ScogginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954