Legal Opinion

Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 25, 2011No. 02-56256, 02-56390, 09-56381Published

1Opinion of the Court

671 F.3d 736 (2011)

Alexis Holyweek SAREI; Paul E. Nerau; Thomas Tamausi; Phillip Miriori; Gregory Kopa; Methodius Nesiko; Aloysius Moses; Rapheal Niniku; Gabriel Tareasi; Linus Takinu, Leo Wuis; Michael Akope; Benedict Pisi; Thomas Kobuko; John Tamausi; Norman Mouvo; John Osani; Ben Korus; Namira Kawona; Joanne Bosco; John Pigolo; Magdalene Pigolo, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

RIO TINTO, PLC and Rio Tinto Limited, Defendants-Appellees.

Alexis Holyweek Sarei; Paul E. Nerau; Thomas Tamausi; Phillip Miriori; Gregory Kopa;…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Kleinfeld; Dissent · Ikuta.

2Cases cited144 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API