Legal Opinion

State v. Millett

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 2, 2012No. 20090400-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, Judge:

{ 1 Defendant Shane L. Millett appeals his convictions for sodomy on a child, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-408.1(1)-(2) (2008), and aggravated sexual abuse of a child, see id. § 76-5-404.1(4)-(5), both first degree felonies, arguing that he is entitled to a new trial because an empaneled juror withheld material information in response to questions asked during voir dire, which information, if disclosed, would have supported a valid basis to challenge the juror for cause. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

BACKGROUND

2 In 2005, Millett was accused of sexually abusing his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. HarmonUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. van Frank v. Salt Lake City CorporationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  2. State v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API