State v. Millett
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, Judge:
{ 1 Defendant Shane L. Millett appeals his convictions for sodomy on a child, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-408.1(1)-(2) (2008), and aggravated sexual abuse of a child, see id. § 76-5-404.1(4)-(5), both first degree felonies, arguing that he is entitled to a new trial because an empaneled juror withheld material information in response to questions asked during voir dire, which information, if disclosed, would have supported a valid basis to challenge the juror for cause. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
BACKGROUND
2 In 2005, Millett was accused of sexually abusing his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HarmonUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- van Frank v. Salt Lake City CorporationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- State v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014