Safford v. Morris Metal Products Co.

The trial court held that the instant case is governed by the decision in Ahern v. Purnell, 62 Conn. 21, 25 Atl. 393, and rightly so. In that case a certain number of packages of tea were described in the return as property attached, and certain other property attempted to be attached was described as “all the stock and goods in said defendant’s store, situated on Main Street, South Manchester, in said town,” etc. The then-existing statute (General Statutes, 1888, § 907) relating to the method of procedure by the officer attaching, read as follows: “... in every case of attachment, the…