Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Phares Hoy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1991No. 90-30254PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant Robert Hoy was sentenced under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines to 78 months in custody for robbing the Security Pacific Bank in Portland, Oregon. After the robbery, but before he was sentenced on the robbery charge, Hoy committed two other offenses which resulted in state court sentences. The district court counted these state sentences as “prior sentences” in calculating Hoy’s criminal history under the guidelines.

Hoy argues that the district court erred in counting the state sentences as “prior sentences” under the guidelines because the conduct for which the sentences…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Kenneth CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Lemont D. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Robert L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Darrell MacKbeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. James Sherman WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Stephen Martin BeddowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Jair De Jesus MejiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. DurantCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  4. United States v. Gustavo Valdez-Soto, United States of America v. Fabio Gomez-TelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Juan David VilchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API