Legal Opinion

Schulmann Realty Group v. Hazlet Township Rent Control Board

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 23, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

VILLANUEVA, J.A.D.

(retired and temporarily assigned on recall).

Plaintiff Schulmann Realty Group, a partnership doing business under the name Brookside Mobile Estates, appeals from a judgment of the Law Division that dismissed its complaint challenging the decision of the Hazlet Township Rent Control Board (Board) with respect to a hardship rent increase. The Hazlet Board granted plaintiff an increase of $23.89 per month per unit to be paid for five years; thereafter said rent increase would not constitute base rent in any future rent increase…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Handlon v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. In Re KallenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heyert v. TaddeseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  2. BISHOP PROPERTY MANAGEMENT VS. THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY RENT LEVELING BOARD (L-0602-19, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  3. OM 309-311 6th STREET, LLC and OM 1101-1109 PALISADE AVENUE, LLC v. THE CITY OF UNION CITY, UNION CITY RENT STABILIZATION BOARD AKA THE CITY OF UNION CITY RENT LEVELING BOARDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API