Legal Opinion

City of Springfield v. Stovall

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1962No. 593PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKerns, J.

On May 6, 1961, an affidavit was filed in the Municipal Court of Springfield, Ohio, charging the defendant with the following offense:

“* * * one Charles D. Stovall did fail to stop on the yellow or caution signal of a traffic control signal at the intersection of Columbia and Spring Streets, when said yellow or caution signal was shown following the green or go signal, contrary to Section 721.01 (b), Codified Ordinances of said city in such case made and provided.”

Thereafter, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the charge against him on the grounds that the ordinance of the city of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Cozart v. CarranOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Case v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Stann v. Jack P. Taus & Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
  2. Haraszti v. KlarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. City of Columbus v. SharafOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. City of South Euclid v. Moss, Unpublished Decision (10-14-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Simpson v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API