Legal Opinion

Millican v. Mintz

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 19, 1953No. 7 Div. 155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Statutory action in the nature of ejectment by plaintiff Mintz against defendants Millican.

This court has previously considered this case three times. Mintz v. Millican, 248 Ala. 683, 29 So.2d 230; Millican v. Mintz, 251 Ala. 358, 37 So.2d 425; Id., 255 Ala. 569, 52 So.2d 207. There was satisfactory evidence to establish that the plaintiff had been in adverse possession of certain lands for the required number of years so as to ripen into title. Regrettably, however, due to the manifest uncertainty or inconsistency in the jury’s verdict on which the judgment must rest — to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bradford v. SneedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Lessley v. PraterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Mintz v. MillicanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Millican v. MintzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Millican v. MintzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mintz v. MillicanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Golden v. RollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Godsey v. AnglinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API