Legal Opinion

Staub v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 15, 1975No. 74-1504PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MacKINNON.

MacKINNON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant challenges the constitutionality of 38 U.S.C. § 3404(c), which limits the fees payable to agents or attorneys representing veterans on claims for monetary benefits before the Veterans Administration (VA) to $10 per claim. The District Court dismissed the complaint for failure to present a substantial constitutional issue. Since we find that the constitutional questions raised by appellant are not insubstantial, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Appellant Staub, a veteran who served on active…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United Mine Workers v. Illinois State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Ex Rel. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. WaltersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
  2. Bahnmiller v. DerwinskiDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
  3. Staub v. RoudebushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
  4. Staub v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API