Staub v. Roudebush
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WADDY, District Judge.
This is an action challenging the constitutionality of 38 U.S.C. § 3404(c)(2) which limits the fees payable to agents or attorneys representing veterans on claims for monetary benefits before the Veterans Administration (VA) to $10 for any one claim.
Relying on Hines v. Lowrey, 305 U.S. 85, 59 S.Ct. 31, 83 L.Ed. 56 (1938), and Hoffmaster v. Veterans Administration, 444 F.2d 192 (3rd Cir. 1971), this Court granted defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissed the action. The Court of Appeals vacated the dismissal and remanded, sub nom.,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United Mine Workers v. Illinois State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. WaltersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
- Staub v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978