Legal Opinion

Cline v. Fidelity Phenix Fire Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1925No. 23128PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

Action by plaintiff, based upon an alleged oral contract of insurance with defendant, to recover for the loss of a barn by fire. The defendant denied the existence of the contract and denied the authority of its agent to make such a contract in its behalf. At the close of the testimony the trial court directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, which was done, and thereupon rendered judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals and now urges that the question of the authority of the agent to make the contract should have been submitted to the jury.

The record shows that in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Milwaukee & Wyoming Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Thomson v. SheltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Holt v. SchneiderNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Kor v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Phœnix Insurance v. WalterNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rhoads v. Columbia Fire Underwriters AgencyNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Hawes v. American Central InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Whitehall v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Schnell v. United Hail InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API