Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Godbold

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1998No. Docket 194171Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJansen, J.

I concur with parts n and m of the majority’s opinion that the prosecutor did not impermissibly shift the burden of proof during closing argument by stating that the failure of a defense witness to appear at trial was “convenient,” and that there was sufficient evidence presented at trial to sustain the trial court’s verdict. I must dissent, however, from the majority’s decision to sanction the trial court’s stated policy of giving defendants lower sentences for having a bench trial. I believe that such a policy should not be institutionalized because it punishes defendants who exercise their…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. People v. CobbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. SnowMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API