People v. Godbold
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJansen, J.
I concur with parts n and m of the majority’s opinion that the prosecutor did not impermissibly shift the burden of proof during closing argument by stating that the failure of a defense witness to appear at trial was “convenient,” and that there was sufficient evidence presented at trial to sustain the trial court’s verdict. I must dissent, however, from the majority’s decision to sanction the trial court’s stated policy of giving defendants lower sentences for having a bench trial. I believe that such a policy should not be institutionalized because it punishes defendants who exercise their…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. CobbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. SnowMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.