Legal Opinion

United States v. Miguel Escamilla, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 29, 2017No. 16-40333PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:

Miguel Escamilla appeals his convictions for conspiring to possess and possessing with the intent to distribute marijuana and heroin. Pressing five issues, Escamilla argues that the district court erroneously failed to suppress incriminating evidence that government agents obtained from an allegedly unconstitutional stop and ultimate arrest. We hold that much of the agents’ conduct was reasonable and therefore constitutional. We also hold, however, that the district court erred by admitting evidence obtained from an unconstitutional, post-arrest search of a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Brian ThurmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Arturo SarliCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Cristofer Gallegos-EspinalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. Smith v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API