United States v. Miguel Escamilla, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:
Miguel Escamilla appeals his convictions for conspiring to possess and possessing with the intent to distribute marijuana and heroin. Pressing five issues, Escamilla argues that the district court erroneously failed to suppress incriminating evidence that government agents obtained from an allegedly unconstitutional stop and ultimate arrest. We hold that much of the agents’ conduct was reasonable and therefore constitutional. We also hold, however, that the district court erred by admitting evidence obtained from an unconstitutional, post-arrest search of a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Brian ThurmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Arturo SarliCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Cristofer Gallegos-EspinalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Smith v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.