United States v. Arturo Sarli
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES C. HO, Circuit Judge:
*493 Following a tip from a confidential source, Arturo Sarli was arrested and convicted for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He challenges his conviction under the Fourth and Sixth Amendments. We unanimously deny Sarli's Fourth Amendment claim, on the ground that he consented to the search of his vehicle. But we are divided with respect to Sarli's claim that, due to certain statements made at trial in violation of the Confrontation Clause, he is entitled to a new trial.
During trial, both the prosecutor and a prosecution witness referred to certain…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Sean Lamont CromerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Coy JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Cristofer Gallegos-EspinalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. HamannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Marcus Coleman v. Darrel Vannoy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.