Legal Opinion
Ice Plant Equipment Co. v. Martocello
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 18, 1941No. 9745PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The relief asked for is: (1) A declaratory judgment as to the validity and infringement of sixteen patents owned by the defendant, which, the complaint avers, have been the subject of warnings and threats on the part of the defendant directed against the plaintiff, his distributor, and the trade generally; (2) a decree against the defendant for unfair trade competition; (3) triple damages under the Anti-Trust Laws. An answer has been filed, together with a counterclaim, and motions by both parties are now before the Court.
Sur Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
As to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Reed v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- Nieman v. Bethlehem Nat. BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Nieman v. LongDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barthel v. StammCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Wells v. Universal Pictures Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Mesirow v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Eleanor G. Biggs v. Public Service Coordinated Transport v. Robert Washington Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Mesirow v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.