Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1976No. 51222PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

1. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the conviction.

2. However, the judgment must be reversed because the trial judge erred by instructing the jury that the defendant had the burden of proving the affirmative defense of coercion by a preponderance of the evidence.

We, the judges of both appellate courts, have thoroughly confused the law on whether a defendant in a criminal case has any burden of proof or of persuasion. The writer is equally at fault — having concurred in Gibbons v. State, 136 Ga. App. 609 (222 SE2d 55).

Under constitutional concepts, the answer has to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. State v. McNeillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Chandle v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. M. W. Holloway v. Clay E. McElroy WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Bruce v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API