Legal Opinion
Marcus v. Garland, Samuel & Loeb, P.C.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided July 2, 2006No. 05-21550-CIVKINGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Final Summary Judgment (DE #24), filed May 8, 2006. 1 July 3, 2006, the Court heard Oral Argument on the instant Motion. (See DE #37.)
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Paul Marcus [Florida lawyer] filed the above-styled breach of contract action against Defendants, Garland, Samuel & Loeb, P.C. and Edward Garland [Georgia law firm and Georgia lawyer] to enforce an oral agreement to share attorney’s fees without the client’s consent.
Plaintiffs Complaint alleges that on or about September…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John M. HAIRSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the GAINESVILLE SUN PUBLISHING CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Johnson Enterprises of Jacksonville, Inc. v. FPL Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Topp, Inc. v. Uniden American Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- Dunn v. DartNorth Carolina Business Court · 2011
- Griffin v. Motorsport Games Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2025