Legal Opinion
Corkin v. Elger Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 7, 1965No. 5379PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
In Coltin Company v. Manchester Savings Bank, 105 N. H. 254, it was held that a brokerage contract made in New Hampshire with respect to New Hampshire real estate of a New Hampshire corporation was unenforceable at the instance of a foreign broker not licensed under RSA ch. 331-A (supp). The case before us presents the question of whether such a contract entered into in Massachusetts between residents of that jurisdiction relating to real estate in New Hampshire is likewise unenforceable in our courts by a broker unlicensed in this state.
As was pointed out in Coltin, supra, the statute (RSA…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reed v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Richland Development Company, Inc. And National Pool Equipment Company v. George Staples, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Horwitz v. FOOD TOWN, INCORPORATEDDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1965
- McGillivray v. CronrathIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Henning v. HillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Finlay Commercial Real Estate, Inc. v. PainoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Ira H. Shinberg v. Paul BrukCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Suburban Realty, Inc. v. AlbinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989