Legal Opinion
Miller v. City of Cincinnati
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 24, 2010No. 08-4679PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARTHA CRAIG DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.
In this section 1983 action, the plaintiffs, two political advocacy groups and an individual member of one of the groups, claim that defendant City of Cincinnati’s regulation governing access to the interior spaces of city hall violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. After ruling in the plaintiffs’ favor on a jurisdictional challenge by the defendants, the district court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. The district court concluded that the plaintiffs had established a substantial…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Parsons v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- American Civil Liberties Union Fund v. Livingston CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Tracy Bays v. City of FairbornCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- In re Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
- Ohio Citizen Action v. City of EnglewoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.