Legal Opinion

Cullinane v. Board of Selectmen

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 9, 2001No. 99-P-53PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

This proceeding started with a complaint to the Maynard board of selectmen suggesting, in effect, that two dogs, “Shadow,” a female Rottweiler, and her daughter “Misty,” a mixed breed, were a pair constituting (to quote from G. L. c. 140, § 1571) “a nuisance by reason of vicious disposi*852tian,” and seeking remedy by an “order concerning the restraint or disposal” of the dogs. The proceeding has wound its way from selectmen to clerk-magistrate to judge of District Court to Superior Court with regrettable slowness; it is now in its fifth year with the dogs left meanwhile in custody of the town’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. One 1972 Chevrolet VanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. FerreriMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Nercessian v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Durbin v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API