Durbin v. Board of Selectmen
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtLaurence, J.
On April 10, 1999, two dogs belonging to the Durbins, then residents of Kingston, attacked a small child. Acting in response to a complaint from the child’s father, pursuant to G. L. c. 140, § 157,2 the Kingston board of selectmen determined that the two dogs were “a nuisance by reason of vicious disposition,” and ordered the dogs to be destroyed. The proceedings arising from that complaint have worked their way from the Kingston board of selectmen to the District Court clerk-magistrate to a judge of the District Court to a judge of the Superior Court, with each tribunal determining the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- New Boston Garden Corp. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. WheltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Stetson v. Board of Selectmen of CarlisleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Symmons v. O'KeeffeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Figgs v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Higby/Fulton Vineyard, LLC v. Board of Health of TisburyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Mello Construction, Inc. v. Division of Capital Asset ManagementMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Seales v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- Edward P. Clark Post, 107, American Legion, Inc. v. Town of Natick Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.