Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Lane
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 3, 2000No. 99-74205PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS (COUNTS I & II)
EDMUNDS, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Ford Motor Co.’s motion to dismiss Defendant Robert Lane’s counterclaims. Lane stipulates to the dismissal of Count I, a SLAPPback claim. Count II alleges an Antitrust violation by Ford in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Lane seeks treble damages pursuant to section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15. As discussed below, Lane cannot establish antitrust injury, nor does he otherwise have standing to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Berghausen v. Microsoft Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gamboa v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020