Legal Opinion
Lee v. Javitch, Block & Rathbone, LLP
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 17, 2007No. 1:06 CV 585PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BECKWITH, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. (Doc. 13) Plaintiff opposes the motion (Doc. 16) and Defendants have replied. (Doc. 17) Defendants have also filed two notices of additional authority (Doc. 20 and 24) in support of their motions.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
According to her complaint, Norma Lee receives Social Security benefits. She was sued on a consumer debt she allegedly owed. Defendant Javitch, Block & Rath-bone is a law firm and a “debt collector” subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Defendant Victor Javitch is an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Grindstaff v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Robert Fitzke and Joy Fitzke v. Barry Shappell, Deputy Sheriff, and Elwin Smith, Sheriff, of Eaton County, Michigan, Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kline v. Mortgage Electronic Security SystemsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Midland Funding LLC v. BrentDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Turner v. Lerner, Sampson & RothfussDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
- Lu v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025