Legal Opinion

Blehm v. Ringering

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1971PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

This is an action at law on oral agreement to recover the reasonable value of certain improvements. The case was tried before the court without a jury. The trial court entered general findings in favor of the plaintiffs and granted judgment in the sum of $766.79. The defendants appeal.

There is no transcript of testimony or agreed narrative statement of the facts. The appeal is before this court, based on the trial court file, including the court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment Order, and exhibits one through three. ORS 19.074(1)(2a).

The plaintiffs allege that on April 15,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. CALDWELL ET UX v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. First State & Savings Bank v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Roseburg Nat. Bank v. CampOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Mattechek v. PughOregon Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hatley v. StaffordOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Wescold, Inc. v. Logan International, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Land Reclamation, Inc. v. Riverside CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Reeder v. KayOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Johnson v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API