Legal Opinion
United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 3, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2004-0798PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
G. MICHAEL HARVEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This case was referred to the undersigned for the management of discovery. Currently ripe is Claimant Pavel Lazarenko’s motion for protective order relating to his request for a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service. After reviewing the entire record, 1 the Court will deny the motion.
BACKGROUND
The factual background concerning this in rem asset forfeiture action has been described in multiple opinions by Judge Friedman. See, e.g., United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co., Ltd., 772 F.Supp.2d…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mischler v. Novagraaf Group BvDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022