Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Pirkle

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 12, 1947No. 15855PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Chief Justice.

1. Private citizens may not generally interfere to have a public nuisance enjoined, but the petition must proceed for the public on information filed by the solicitor-general of the circuit. A public nuisance may be abated on the application of any citizen specially injured.” Code, § 72-202.(a) The allegations of the instant petition with reference to special injury sustained by the plaintiff to his health and to his property were sufficient to authorize an action in his, own name to abate the alleged public nuisance complained of; and while, as hereinafter shown, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooper v. RollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. City Council of Augusta v. MarksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Starnes v. Mutual Loan & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Poss v. NorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Planters Bank v. Georgia Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Brookside Village v. ComeauTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Honey Brook Township v. AlenovitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Pruitt v. MeeksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. Hornstein v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  5. Niskey Lake Water Works, Inc. v. GarnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API