Legal Opinion
Hoferek v. University of Missouri
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided February 15, 1985No. 84-4119-CV-C-5PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SCOTT O. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.
Background
Plaintiff has filed a 3-count complaint against the ” above-named defendants. Count 1 alleges violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; Count 2 raises a tort claim against Uehling and Zanders; and Count 3 alleges a breach of contract claim against the same two defendants.
Defendants have moved to dismiss Counts 2 and 3 for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, on the grounds that they are barred by the Eleventh Amendment. Plaintiff maintains that the Eleventh Amendment to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Charles Sherman v. Curators of the University of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Kizer v. Curators of University of MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993
- Cuello-Suarez v. Autoridad De Energia Electrica De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1990
- Flowers v. ReboDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1987
- Bakken v. North American Coal Corp.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.