Legal Opinion

Galusha v. Meserve

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1922No. Civ. No. 3899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Action to obtain a decree declaring void a purported sale of real property by a trustee under a trust deed; to set aside the sale and permit the plaintiff to redeem. Judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff appeals.

The deed of trust was made by the plaintiff to Title Guarantee and Trust Company, a corporation, to secure the payment of a stated indebtedness to the defendant Cora D. Meserve. It was provided therein that on default in payment, the trustee was empowered to sell the property “in order to accomplish the objects of these trusts, in the manner following, namely: The party…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. JaccardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Koch v. BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Cosgriff v. Bd. of Election Commr's of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Herbert Kraft Co. v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Seccombe v. RoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Flakoll v. HalamudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Oller v. Sonoma County Land Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Bayer v. HoaglandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Oliason v. GirardIdaho Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API