Legal Opinion
Bruce Kirby, Inc. v. LaserPerformance (Europe) Limited
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 2, 2025No. 3:13-cv-00297Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRUCE KIRBY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 3:13-cv-00297 (JAM) LASERPERFORMANCE (EUROPE) LIMITED, et al., Defendants. ORDER ON REMAND Before the Court are the parties’ memoranda concerning Lanham Act damages following the Second Circuit’s limited remand. See Estate of Kirby v. LaserPerformance (Europe) Ltd.,
2023 WL 5319216
(2d Cir. 2023). The plaintiffs—the Estate of Bruce Kirby and Bruce Kirby, Inc.—argue that the Court should enter judgment in their favor in the amount of nearly seven million dollars. The defendants—LaserPerformance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lewis v. WhelanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- H.C. v. NYC DOECourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Panagiotis Kotsopoulos v. Asturia Shipping Co., S.A., Hadjilias & Co., Ltd., and the S/t Mercury, Her Engines, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020