Legal Opinion

Newcomb v. Ingram

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932Published

1Opinion

The following opinion was filed April 11, 1933:

Fowler, J.

(on rehearing). A motion for rehearing was granted and reargument made upon two questions which will be particularly stated later. We will first dispose of some contentions made on the motions for rehearing upon which we did not consider reargument was necessary or would be helpful.

1. The surety on the second bond so confidently asserts that the case of Conant v. Newton, 126 Mass. 105, requires us to hold that it is entirely released because the order appointing the trustee was void and this voided the bond also, *106that we are moved to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Northern Wisconsin Co-operative Tobacco Pool v. BekkedalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Will of Leonard v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Zartner v. HolzhauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Asylum of St. Vincent De Paul v. McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API