Legal Opinion

Lange v. Klatt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1903No. Docket No. 14PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Assumpsit by Ad die Lange, administratrix of the estate of Edward Lange, deceased, against William F. Klatt, for money loaned. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by the plaintiff, as administratrix of the estate of Edward Lange, deceased, to recover the sum of $500, claimed to have been loaned by decedent to the defendant on March 25, 1898. Lange was the uncle of the defendant. Some time prior to Lange’s death, defendant ran a saloon and restaurant in the city of Detroit, and Lange was in the habit of visiting him whenever he came to the city. On the 25th of March, Lange gave the defendant the sum of $500, no note being taken therefor. Plaintiff says that this sum.was given to the defendant as a loan; defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fox v. Barrett's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Conwill v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Bishop v. ShurlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Harrah v. Wharton ex rel. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Cady v. BurgessMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API