Legal Opinion

In re Olson ex rel. A.C.O. v. Olson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 13, 2017No. A16-1568Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLEARY, Chief Judge

Appellant-father Bradley Charles Olson challenges a district court’s grant of an order for protection (OFP) arguing that the OFP is based on inadmissible hearsay allegations contained in respondent-mother Christina Marie Olson’s petition and affidavit for an OFP. Because a finding of domestic abuse following a contested hearing must be made on admissible evidence, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

On August 17, 2016, respondent filed a petition and affidavit for an OFP on behalf of her minor children, A.C.O. and N.P.O., then ages ten and eight, respectively, against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. BergstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Palladium Holdings, LLC v. Zuni Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-OA1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. W.G.O. v. CrandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API