Legal Opinion

Rooke v. Day

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 28, 1932No. 22172PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

This was a proceeding by rule nisi to vacate a judgment of the court of ordinary allowing a second year’s support to the widow of an intestate. The original ground of the motion was that the administrators of the intestate had not been served with notice of the application for a second year’s support. The record shows an acknowledgment of service by attorneys for the administrators, dated the same day as that on which the application was filed; that after the return of the appraisers, citation was issued and published, and that, no objection having been filed, the return was admitted to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. RountreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Anderson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Buice v. Lowman Gold & Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  4. Martin v. GaissertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Mackie, Beattie & Co. v. GlendenningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Rasmussen v. NodvinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Hatcher v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Peoples v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Carroll v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API