Legal Opinion

Neely v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1922No. 8 Div. 857PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The former opinion rendered by this court in this case is withdrawn, and under the authority of Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General, Neely v. State (Ala. Sup.) 93 South. 382, 1 we hold that the dem.urrers to the indictment were properly overruled.

Special charges 3, 4,, 5, and 6, alleged to have been refused to defendant, are not properly authenticated. They bear no indorsement of the trial judge, nor do they appear to have been filed with the clerk of the court. It follows, therefore, that these charges cannot be considered.

There was some evidence, adduced upon this trial, tending…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Byrd v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Coplon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. White v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Phillips v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brewington v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Love v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API