Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1990No. 903SC69PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

By his first assignment of error, defendant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the habitual felon indictment, contending that the allegations of the indictment fail to sufficiently set out a charge of habitual felon because the indictment does not allege the name of the state or other sovereign against whom the felony offenses were committed. We disagree.

G.S. § 14-7.3 sets forth the requisites for a proper indictment stating the charge of habitual felon and provides in pertinent part that “[a]n indictment which charges a person with being an habitual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. SwimmSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. WinsteadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MontfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. JefferiesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API