Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Lappin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 2, 2009No. Civil Action 09-972 (HHK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff Martin Armstrong, a prisoner serving a criminal sentence, is currently confined at the Federal Correctional Institution Fort Dix, in Fort Dix, New Jersey. Paying the $350.00 fee for filing a civil action, he filed a pro se complaint “for personal injury,” pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680. The complaint names as defendants the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wilton Chatman-Bey v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Armstrong v. GuccioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Jacksonville Port Authority, a Body Politic and Corporate of the State of Florida v. Brock Adams, as Secretary of Transportation of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shipley v. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Shipley v. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010