Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. v. Trust Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 12, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
In this suit the state seeks a judgment against the Holston Trust Company, of Knoxville, incorporated in Tennessee, under a banking and trust company charter, in the statutorily prescribed form which confers the power to do a general banking business. The claim is for two items: (1) A balance of interest on two deposits, aggregating $60,000, made in 1927 and 1928; and (2) $250,000 and interest, being a deposit made in June, 1930. Recovery is also sought against certain named individuals as sureties on two bonds executed to secure the state against loss on these several deposits. The trust…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Dair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. First Nat. Bank of BurlingameCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Bowditch v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Buice v. Scruggs Equipment Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- Thomas Learning Center, Inc. v. McGuirkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Bryant Const. Co. v. Cook Const. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Kirkendall v. HeckingerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bajdek v. Board of Trustees of American Legion Pulaski Post No. 357 TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.